3 active projects.
Tasks, board and timeline, Client progress view, Drive file references.
See proposed plans ↗Explore what Track is designed to do, what comes later, and which proposed plan includes it. No feature here is a shipping Track capability.
Track has not shipped yet. Explore the design—not a live product.Scope agreed
Ravi · in review
Approval needed
Delivery status is one view. The cost of delivery is another.
Remaining work, other costs and tax are not included in this snapshot.
Client-view concept: no internal rates, cost totals or private notes. This illustration is not an access-control system.
Search the full proposal or filter by the kind of work. Two capabilities are explicitly marked for later.
29 results
Give each piece of work a responsible person and a clear next date.
ExploreDifferent views of one project; a timeline is not a full critical-path scheduler.
ExploreBreak a deliverable into the smaller steps needed to finish it.
ExploreStart from a reviewed previous project and adjust the scope.
ExploreMake a decision point visible before the next stage begins.
ExplorePrepare a repeatable starting point for retainers and monthly work.
ExploreKeep the prerequisite beside the task it affects.
ExploreRecord the hours against the work they belong to.
ExploreSeparate the internal cost of delivery from the price charged to a client.
ExploreCompare quoted value with logged labour cost while delivery continues.
ExploreA proposed connection for invoiced and paid amounts—not a working integration.
ExploreInspect the cost position of several projects together.
ExploreSet an agreed point for reviewing time or cost against the plan.
ExplorePlan for different commercial arrangements; confirm the final calculation rules.
ExploreThe proposal meters active projects rather than seats.
ExploreShare the agreed delivery view without internal rates, costs or notes.
ExploreDefine who may see project work and who may see its costs.
ExploreDiscuss committed effort, not just the number of open cards.
ExploreBroader resource planning is outside the first-release proposal.
ExploreTurn an approved brief into tasks for a person to review.
ExploreSurface a dependency and the decision that might unblock it.
ExplorePrepare a client update from permitted project activity; a person sends it.
ExploreSuggest a review from recorded costs and assumptions—not a profit prediction.
ExploreLink project work to its supporting files, with permissions retained.
ExploreKeep the customer and agreed scope near the work; connection proposed.
ExploreExplore overdue work, risk, hours, cost position and unbilled activity.
ExploreProposed review rules and integration access; no API contract is published here.
ExploreThe design includes projects, tasks, comments, hours and file references.
ExploreResponsive browser access is the initial direction; native apps are later.
ExploreNo matches. Clear the search or choose another group.
These show intended boundaries, not a live permission system.
Illustrative workspace · no account connected
Illustrative workspace · no account connected
Client-view concept: no internal rates, cost totals or private notes. This illustration is not an access-control system.
All entitlements are subject to confirmation before launch.
Tasks, board and timeline, Client progress view, Drive file references.
See proposed plans ↗Time and hourly cost rates, Project cost view, Budgets and review points.
See proposed plans ↗Portfolio cost view, Approval rules, API and webhooks.
See proposed plans ↗A clear boundary is more useful than an implied checkbox.
Open a question for the details.
Look closer at the design, or bring us the workflow you need.
Explore the next part of Track.
Explore ↗Explore Centilio’s products and their current release stages.
Explore products ↗Discuss your project workflow. This opens the contact page, not a waitlist signup.
Contact Centilio ↗